1 Introduction

The Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB), scientifically known as Leptinotarsa decemlineata, is a notorious pest that primarily targets potato crops but also affects other solanaceous plants such as eggplants and tomatoes. Native to North America, CPB has become a global agricultural threat due to its rapid spread and adaptability. The beetle's larvae and adults feed on the leaves of host plants, causing significant defoliation and yield loss (Balaško et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Over the years, CPB has developed resistance to numerous insecticides, making its management increasingly challenging.

The CPB is considered one of the most destructive pests in potato cultivation worldwide. Its ability to develop resistance to a wide range of insecticides has exacerbated the problem, leading to increased pesticide use, environmental pollution, and higher production costs for farmers (Molnár and Rakosy-Tican, 2021; Pélissié et al., 2021). The beetle's adaptability and rapid spread have made it a significant concern in regions where it was previously absent, such as parts of Europe and Asia (Mi et al., 2015; Gao et al, 2022). Effective management of CPB is crucial for ensuring food security and sustainable agricultural practices.

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current strategies and technologies used to prevent the spread of CPB. By examining various pest management methods, including chemical, biological, and genetic approaches, this study identifies effective and sustainable solutions for controlling CPB populations, and highlights the challenges and future directions in CPB management, with a focus on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies that minimize environmental impact and promote long-term agricultural sustainability.

2 Biology and Behavior of Colorado Potato Beetle

2.1 Life cycle and developmental stages

The Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) undergoes a complete metamorphosis with four distinct life stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult (Figure 1). The developmental stages are regulated by various microRNAs, which play crucial roles in growth, reproduction, and insecticide resistance (Wiebe et al., 2020). The egg stage is characterized by longer miRNAs, while the early stages (first to third instar larvae) and late stages (fourth instar, prepupae, pupae, and adult) have distinct miRNA profiles. This beetle's ability to adapt to different environments and host plants is partly due to its genetic makeup, which includes a high level of nucleotide diversity and rapidly evolving transposable elements (Schoville et al., 2017).

2.2 Feeding habits and host plants

The Colorado potato beetle primarily feeds on solanaceous plants, including potatoes, eggplants, and tomatoes (Palli, 2014; Wang et al., 2020). Both larvae and adults are capable of causing significant damage by defoliating plants, which can lead to substantial yield losses. The beetle has developed various physiological adaptations to its host plants, such as the suppression of plant defense mechanisms through frass-associated bacteria (Gao et al., 2022). These bacteria, including Acinetobacter and Citrobacter, inhibit the expression of genes associated with jasmonic acid-mediated defense signaling pathways in potato plants, thereby enhancing larval growth.

2.3 Environmental factors influencing spread

The spread of the Colorado potato beetle is influenced by several environmental factors, including climate and host plant availability. Climate change is expected to expand the beetle's range into northern regions and other areas with suitable environmental conditions (Wang et al., 2017). The availability of wild host plants, such as Solanum rostratum, also facilitates the beetle's spread by providing additional food sources. The beetle's movement is influenced by pheromones produced by both males and females, which play a role in attracting mates and coordinating feeding activities (Molnár et al., 2017; Haber and Weber, 2021). The male-produced aggregation pheromone attracts both sexes, while the female-produced sex pheromone specifically attracts males. By understanding the biology and behavior of the Colorado potato beetle, researchers can develop more effective strategies for managing this pest and preventing its spread.

3 Traditional Control Methods

3.1 Chemical pesticides

Chemical pesticides have been the cornerstone of Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB) management for decades. Various classes of insecticides, including organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, and neonicotinoids, have been employed to control CPB populations effectively. However, the efficacy of these chemicals has diminished over time due to the beetle's remarkable ability to develop resistance (Figure 2) (Balaško et al., 2020; Molnár and Rakosy-Tican, 2021). For instance, pyrethroids, once highly effective, now face significant resistance issues, necessitating higher doses and more frequent applications, which are unsustainable and environmentally detrimental.

In neonicotinoid insecticides, the pesticide works by binding to the acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), disrupting neural transmission. However, CPB has developed resistance to neonicotinoids through structural changes in the nAChR and mutations at binding sites. Regarding pyrethroids, CPB significantly reduces the impact of these insecticides on the nervous system through mutations in its sodium channel genes, such as the kdr gene mutation, leading to resistance. For organophosphates and carbamate insecticides, CPB renders these pesticides ineffective through mutations in the structure of acetylcholinesterase (AChE). CPB further enhances its resistance to various pesticides through enhanced metabolic pathways (e.g., increased activity of esterases, glutathione S-transferases, and cytochrome P450 enzymes) and strengthened excretion mechanisms. The presence of these resistance mechanisms has made traditional chemical control measures increasingly ineffective.

The CPB is notorious for its rapid development of resistance to chemical insecticides. This resistance has been documented for over 54 different insecticides, making chemical control increasingly challenging (Schoville et al., 2017; Timani et al., 2023). The phenomenon known as the 'insecticide treadmill' describes the cycle of developing new chemicals to replace those that have become ineffective due to resistance. This resistance is facilitated by genetic adaptations, including high levels of nucleotide diversity and the presence of transposable elements in the CPB genome, which contribute to its rapid evolutionary changes. Monitoring and managing resistance through Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies are crucial to mitigate this issue (Balaško et al., 2020).

3.2 Cultural practices

Crop rotation is a fundamental cultural practice in managing CPB populations. By rotating potato crops with non-host plants, the life cycle of the beetle is disrupted, reducing its population density and subsequent damage (Alyokhin et al., 2015). This practice is particularly effective because it prevents the beetle from establishing a stable population in a single location, thereby reducing the likelihood of severe infestations and the need for chemical interventions.

Mechanical controls, such as hand-picking beetles and using barriers or traps, are traditional methods that can effectively reduce CPB populations, especially in smaller fields or home gardens. These methods are labor-intensive but can be highly effective when combined with other control strategies. Additionally, mechanical tillage can help destroy overwintering beetles in the soil, further reducing the population (Rodrigues et al., 2021)

3.3 Biological control

Biological control using natural predators is an environmentally friendly approach to managing CPB. Predators such as lady beetles, lacewings, and predatory stink bugs can help keep CPB populations in check. However, the effectiveness of these predators can vary based on environmental conditions and the presence of other prey (Alyokhin et al., 2015).

Entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi have shown promise in controlling CPB populations. For example, the nematodes Steinernema carpocapsae and Steinernema feltiae, as well as the fungus Beauveria bassiana, have been tested for their efficacy against CPB. Field studies have demonstrated that these biological agents can significantly reduce CPB populations, although their effectiveness can be inconsistent and may require further optimization for field applications (Čačija et al., 2021; Půža et al., 2021). Additionally, RNA interference (RNAi) technology, which involves the use of double-stranded RNA to silence specific genes in CPB, represents a novel and promising approach to biological control. This method has shown potential in laboratory and field trials, offering a new tool for integrated pest management.

4 Modern Strategies and Technologies

4.1 Integrated pest management (IPM)

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a holistic approach that combines multiple control techniques to manage pest populations at economically tolerable levels. The primary goal of IPM is to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides by integrating biological control, cultural practices, and mechanical methods. This approach is particularly important for managing the Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB), which is notorious for developing resistance to insecticides. The principles of IPM include monitoring pest populations, using economic thresholds to determine when control measures are needed, and employing a combination of control tactics to minimize pest resistance and environmental impact (Starchevskaya et al., 2023).

Several case studies across the United States have demonstrated the effectiveness of IPM in managing CPB populations. For instance, integrating crop rotation with reduced insecticide applications has been shown to delay the development of resistance in CPB populations. These success stories highlight the importance of using a diversified approach to pest management, which can lead to more sustainable and long-term control of this adaptable pest (Alyokhin et al., 2015).

4.2 Genetic engineering

Genetically Modified (GM) crops have been developed to express traits that provide resistance to pests, including the CPB. These crops can reduce the need for chemical insecticides and contribute to the overall goals of IPM. For example, potato varieties have been engineered to express Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins, which are lethal to CPB but safe for non-target organisms and humans (Figure 3). The use of GM crops is a promising strategy for managing CPB populations and reducing the environmental impact of pest control (Rondon et al., 2021).

Balaško et al. (2020) illustrates the mechanism by which genetically modified Bt potatoes combat the Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB): when CPB larvae ingest the Bt toxin, it becomes activated in their gut and binds to receptors. The toxin then inserts into the gut wall membrane, causing leakage of ions and small molecules, which disrupts the midgut membrane. This leads to starvation or septicemia, ultimately resulting in the death of the larvae.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a post-genomic technology that has shown great potential for pest control. In CPB, RNAi-mediated gene silencing has been used to target essential genes involved in development and survival. For instance, silencing N-glycosylation-related genes in CPB has resulted in high mortality rates during the larval stage, making these genes promising targets for RNAi-based pest control strategies. This technology offers a gene-specific mechanism for pest management, which can be integrated into IPM programs to enhance their effectiveness and sustainability (Mi et al., 2015; Schoville et al., 2017).

4.3 Precision agriculture

Precision agriculture involves the use of advanced technologies to monitor and manage agricultural practices more efficiently. Remote sensing technologies, such as drones and satellite imagery, can be used to monitor CPB populations and assess the health of potato crops. These technologies provide real-time data that can help farmers make informed decisions about pest control measures, reducing the need for blanket pesticide applications and minimizing environmental impact (Pélissié et al., 2021).

Automated application systems, such as precision sprayers, can target pest populations more accurately and reduce the amount of pesticides used. These systems can be programmed to apply insecticides only when and where they are needed, based on data collected from remote sensing technologies. This targeted approach not only improves the efficiency of pest control but also reduces the risk of developing insecticide resistance in CPB populations (Pélissié et al., 2021).

4.4 Environmental and regulatory considerations

One of the key considerations in pest management is the impact of control measures on non-target species. Both GM crops and RNAi technologies have been designed to minimize harm to beneficial insects and other non-target organisms. However, continuous monitoring and assessment are necessary to ensure that these technologies do not inadvertently affect the broader ecosystem. The use of IPM principles can help mitigate these risks by promoting the use of multiple, complementary control methods (Naqqash et al., 2020; Rondon et al., 2021).

The development and deployment of new pest control technologies must comply with regulatory frameworks designed to protect human health and the environment. Regulatory agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of GM crops, RNAi-based products, and other pest control methods before they can be used commercially. Compliance with these regulations is essential to ensure that new technologies are used responsibly and sustainably. Ongoing research and collaboration between scientists, regulatory bodies, and farmers are crucial for the successful implementation of these modern strategies and technologies (Liu et al., 2021).

5 Case Study

5.1 Implementation of control strategies in China

The Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB) has been a significant pest in various regions, including China. CPB was first reported in Xinjiang, China, in 1993, and effective control measures were implemented in Mori County. Since 2013, CPB has also been found in Jilin and Heilongjiang in Northeast China, likely migrating from Russia. To combat this, China has developed risk management and monitoring systems to prevent further spread and manage the pest effectively (Kitaev et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020).

5.2 Results and outcomes

The implementation of control strategies in China has shown promising results. In Mori County, the initial invasion was effectively controlled, demonstrating the potential of well-coordinated pest management systems. The use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies, including chemical, biological, and mechanical methods, has been crucial. For instance, the application of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPNs) like Steinernema feltiae and Steinernema carpocapsae has shown efficacy in controlling overwintering CPB populations, with varying success rates across different years (Čačija et al., 2021). Novel approaches such as RNA interference (RNAi) have been tested, showing potential in reducing CPB populations by targeting specific genes (Ma et al., 2020; Pallis et al., 2022).

5.3 Lessons learned and future directions

Several lessons have been learned from the implementation of CPB control strategies in China. The importance of early detection and rapid response cannot be overstated. Effective monitoring systems are essential to identify and manage new invasions promptly. The integration of multiple control methods, including chemical, biological, and mechanical strategies, is necessary to manage resistance and ensure long-term effectiveness.

Future directions should focus on enhancing the sustainability and efficiency of these control methods. Continued research into RNAi and other genetic technologies could provide more targeted and eco-friendly solutions. Understanding the genetic basis of CPB's adaptability and resistance mechanisms through genomic studies can inform the development of more effective control strategies (Pélissié et al., 2021). International collaboration and information sharing are crucial, as CPB is a global pest, and coordinated efforts can help manage its spread more effectively (Almarinez et al., 2023).

6 Challenges and Future Directions

6.1 Emerging threats and adaptations of CPB

The Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB) continues to pose significant challenges due to its remarkable adaptability and rapid development of resistance to various control measures. CPB has developed resistance to over 54 different insecticides, making traditional chemical control methods increasingly ineffective. This adaptability is further complicated by the beetle's ability to exploit frass-associated bacteria to suppress plant defense mechanisms, enhancing its survival and proliferation on potato plants (Gui et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2022). The geographical spread of CPB into new regions, such as Northeast China, underscores the need for robust monitoring and management systems to prevent further invasions.

6.2 Research gaps and needs

Despite advancements in CPB management, several research gaps remain. There is a pressing need for effective resistance monitoring programs capable of early detection of resistance and successful implementation of Integrated Resistance Management (IRM) strategies. The potential of RNA interference (RNAi) technology for CPB control is promising, but a better understanding of the mechanisms affecting its efficiency is crucial for its development and integration into pest management practices (Huseth et al., 2014; Petek et al., 2020). The efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPNs) and fungi in field conditions requires further investigation to optimize their application and improve their effectiveness (Čačija et al., 2021).

6.3 Future technological innovations

Future technological innovations hold promise for more sustainable and effective CPB management. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins offers a potential solution, although challenges related to pest resistance and public acceptance need to be addressed (Guo et al., 2016; Kaplanoglu et al., 2017). The use of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) biopesticides, such as Ledprona, represents a novel approach with a new mode of action that could be integrated into pest management programs (Rodrigues et al., 2021). Advancements in next-generation sequencing and the discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are revolutionizing the field of population genomics, providing tools for the early detection of resistant variants and monitoring of resistant populations (Pélissié et al., 2021). These innovations, combined with a deeper understanding of CPB's evolutionary mechanisms, will be essential for developing sustainable and effective control strategies.

7 Concluding Remarks

The Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB) remains one of the most challenging pests for potato crops globally due to its rapid adaptation and resistance to various insecticides. Traditional chemical control methods have become less effective, necessitating the development of new strategies and technologies. Recent research highlights several promising approaches. RNA interference (RNAi) technology has shown significant potential in controlling CPB populations by targeting specific genes responsible for pest survival and resistance. Crops producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins offer an alternative to chemical insecticides, although resistance and public acceptance remain concerns. Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPNs) have demonstrated efficacy in controlling overwintering CPB populations, providing a biological control method that can reduce the first generation abundance and subsequent damage. Sustainable pest management strategies, including monitoring resistance and using a combination of biological, mechanical, and chemical controls, are essential for long-term CPB management.

The spread of CPB poses a significant threat to global agriculture, particularly in regions where potatoes are a staple crop. Effective management of CPB is crucial for ensuring food security and reducing economic losses. The development and implementation of new technologies such as RNAi and GM crops can provide more sustainable and eco-friendly solutions compared to traditional chemical insecticides. Additionally, the use of biological control agents like EPNs can help mitigate the environmental impact of pest control practices.

To effectively combat the spread of CPB and ensure sustainable agricultural practices, the following recommendations are proposed. Continued investment in research to develop and refine new technologies such as RNAi, GM crops, and biological control agents is essential. This includes understanding the genetic mechanisms of resistance and the ecological impacts of these technologies. Encourage the adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies that combine multiple control methods to reduce reliance on chemical insecticides and delay the development of resistance. Establish robust monitoring systems to detect early signs of CPB invasion and resistance development. This will enable timely interventions and reduce the spread of the pest. Develop policies that support the use of sustainable pest control methods and provide education and training for farmers on best practices for CPB management. This includes promoting the use of biological control agents and the responsible use of chemical insecticides. By adopting these recommendations, policymakers and practitioners can work together to prevent the spread of CPB and protect global potato production.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the feedback from the reviewers on the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Almarinez B., Amalin D., Aviso K., Cabezas H., Lao A., and Tan R., 2023, Network modeling for post-entry management of invasive pest species in the philippines: the case of the colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say, 1824) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Insects, 14(9): 731.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14090731

Alyokhin A., Mota-Sánchez D., Baker M., Snyder W., Menasha S., Whalon M., Dively G., and Moarsi W., 2015, The Red Queen in a potato field: integrated pest management versus chemical dependency in Colorado potato beetle control, Pest Management Science, 71(3): 343-356.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3826

Balaško M., Mikac K., Bažok R., and Lemić D., 2020, Modern techniques in colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) control and resistance management: history review and future perspectives, Insects, 11(9): 581.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090581

Čačija M., Bažok R., Kolenc M., Bujas T., Drmić Z., and Balaško M., 2021, Field Efficacy of Steinernema sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) on the colorado potato beetle overwintering generation, Plants, 10(7): 1464.

https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071464

Gao Z., Ju X., Yang M., Xue R., Li Q., Fu K., Guo W., Tong L., Song Y., Zeng R., and Wang J., 2022, Colorado potato beetle exploits frass-associated bacteria to suppress defense responses in potato plants, Pest Management Science, 78(9): 3778-3787.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6823

Gui S., Taning C., Wei D., and Smagghe G., 2020, First report on CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Journal of Insect Physiology, 121: 104013.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104013

Guo W., Wang Z., Luo X., Jin X., Chang J., He J., Tu E., Tian Y., Si H., and Wu J., 2016, Development of selectable marker-free transgenic potato plants expressing cry3A against the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say), Pest Management Science, 72(3): 497-504.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4013

Haber A., and Weber D., 2021, Both male- and female-produced pheromones influence Colorado potato beetle movement in the field, Pest Management Science, 78(9): 3795-3803.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6739

Huseth A., Groves R., Chapman S., Alyokhin A., Kuhar T., MacRae I., Szendrei Z., and Nault B., 2014, Managing colorado potato beetle insecticide resistance: new tools and strategies for the next decade of pest control in potato, Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 5: 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1603/IPM14009

Kaplanoglu E., Chapman P., Scott I., and Donly C., 2017, Overexpression of a cytochrome P450 and a UDP-glycosyltransferase is associated with imidacloprid resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Scientific Reports, 7(1): 1762.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01961-4

Kitaev K., Mardanshin I., Šurina E., Leontieva T., Udalov M., and Benkovskaya G., 2017, Modeling genetic processes underlying the development of resistance to fipronil in the populations of Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say), Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research, 7: 36-45.

https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059717010063

Liu D., Schutter K., Chen P., and Smagghe G., 2021, The N-glycosylation-related genes as potential targets for RNAi-mediated pest control of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), Pest Management Science, 78(9): 3815-3822.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6732

Ma M., He W., Xu S., Xu L., and Zhang J., 2020, RNA interference in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata): a potential strategy for pest control, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19: 428-437.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62702-4

Mi X., Ji X., Yang J., Liang L., Si H., Wu J., Zhang N., and Wang D., 2015, Transgenic potato plants expressing cry3A gene confer resistance to Colorado potato beetle, Comptes Rendus Biologies, 338(7): 443-450.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.04.005

Molnár I., and Rakosy-Tican E., 2021, Difficulties in potato pest control: the case of pyrethroids on colorado potato beetle, Agronomy, 11(10): 1920.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101920

Molnár I., Besenyei E., Thieme R., Thieme T., Aurori A., Baricz A., Banciu H., and Rakosy-Tican E., 2017, Mismatch repair deficiency increases the transfer of antibiosis and antixenosis properties against Colorado potato beetle in somatic hybrids of Solanum tuberosum + S. chacoense, Pest Management Science, 73(7): 1428-1437.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4473

Naqqash M., Gökçe A., Aksoy E., and Bakhsh A., 2020, Downregulation of imidacloprid resistant genes alters the biological parameters in Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (chrysomelidae: Coleoptera), Chemosphere, 240: 124857.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124857

Palli S., 2014, RNA interference in Colorado potato beetle: steps toward development of dsRNA as a commercial insecticide, Current Opinion in Insect Science, 6: 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COIS.2014.09.011

Pallis S., Alyokhin A., Manley B., Rodrigues T., Buzza A., Barnes E., and Narva K., 2022, Toxicity of a novel dsRNA-based Insecticide to the Colorado potato beetle in laboratory and field trials, Pest Management Science, 78(9): 3836-3848.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6835

Pélissié B., Chen Y., Cohen Z., Crossley M., Hawthorne D., Izzo V., and Schoville S., 2021, Genome resequencing reveals rapid, repeated evolution in the colorado potato beetle, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 39(2): msac016.

https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac016

Petek M., Coll A., Ferenc R., Razinger J., and Gruden K., 2020, Validating the potential of double-stranded RNA targeting colorado potato beetle mesh gene in laboratory and field trials, Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 1250.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01250

Půža V., Nermuť J., Konopická J., and Habuštová O., 2021, Efficacy of the applied natural enemies on the survival of colorado potato beetle adults, Insects, 12(11): 1030.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12111030

Rodrigues T., Mishra S., Sridharan K., Barnes E., Alyokhin A., Tuttle R., Kokulapalan W., Garby D., Skizim N., Tang Y., Manley B., Aulisa L., Flannagan R., Cobb C., and Narva K., 2021, First Sprayable Double-Stranded RNA-based biopesticide product targets Proteasome Subunit Beta type-5 in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 728652.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.728652

Rondon S., Feldman M., Thompson A., Oppedisano T., and Shrestha G., 2021, Identifying resistance to the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) in potato germplasm: review update, Frontiers in Agronomy, 3: 642189.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.642189

Schoville S., Chen Y., Andersson M., Benoit J., Bhandari A., Bowsher J., Brevik K., Cappelle K., Chen M., Childers A., Childers C., Christiaens O., Clements J., Didion E., Elpidina E., Engsontia P., Friedrich M., García-Robles I., Gibbs R., Goswami C., Grapputo A., Gruden K., Grynberg M., Henrissat B., Jennings E., Jones J., Kalsi M., Khan S., Kumar A., Li F., Lombard V., Ma X., Martynov A., Miller N., Mitchell R., Munoz-Torres M., Muszewska A., Oppert B., Palli S., Panfilio K., Pauchet Y., Perkin L., Petek M., Poelchau M., Record E., Rinehart J., Robertson H., Rosendale A., Ruiz-Arroyo V., Smagghe G., Szendrei Z., Thomas G., Torson A., Jentzsch I., Weirauch M., Yates A., Yocum G., Yoon J., and Richards S., 2017, A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Scientific Reports, 8(1): 1931.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20154-1

Starchevskaya M., Kamanova E., Vyatkin Y., Tregubchak T., Bauer T., Bodnev S., Rotskaya U., Polenogova O., Kryukov V., and Antonets D., 2023, The metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in colorado potato beetle public NGS data, Viruses, 15(2): 395.

https://doi.org/10.3390/v15020395

Timani K., Bastarache P., and Morin P., 2023, Leveraging RNA interference to impact insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Insects, 14(5): 418.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050418

Wang C., Hawthorne D., Qin Y., Pan X., Li Z., and Zhu S., 2017, Impact of climate and host availability on future distribution of Colorado potato beetle, Scientific Reports, 7(1): 4489.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04607-7

Wang C., Xu H., and Pan X., 2020, Management of Colorado potato beetle in invasive frontier areas, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19: 360-366.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62801-7

Wiebe K., Elebute O., LeMoine C., and Cassone B., 2020, A day in the life: identification of developmentally regulated MicroRNAs in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata; Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Journal of Economic Entomology, 113: 1445-1454

https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa020